The
Billion-Dollar Boys and Mega-Negotiations Story
By
Dr. Tom DePaoli
I and a
supply management colleague had been working diligently for a year to try and
standardize MRO (Maintenance Repair and Operating) parts to include pumps,
pipes and valves, electrical and operating supplies. We divided the storeroom
parts into these four bucket areas. These were storeroom related parts for a
major process chemical company. We used a market basket sourcing approach. We
had conducted numerous strategic sourcing cross-functional teams and had worked
hard to get our engineers to select standardized parts for our plants. These
sessions were long and arduous. We had
reduced the number of suppliers or OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) in
many categories to one or two. Our goal was to gradually replace the existing
parts as they wore out with the new OEMs and strive for standardization in the
MRO arena. We had a systematic well thought out plan for doing this and had
negotiated contracts with the OEMs and distributers. We were approximately 80%
complete which was quite an accomplishment for the fifty North American plants.
Then the
company suddenly announced that they were in the initial stages of planning a
five-billion-dollar expansion in the United States. The winning five plants had
already been selected. Some of the expansion was to be entirely new plants and
the others were major rebuilds. The capital expansion was to start in six
months. We were faced with managing a major capital expansion and a significant
spend in the MRO area. We met with the Vice-President of engineering and
decided to have a strategy session with him and the five selected plant
engineers. We decided to have a one-shot bidding meeting with our preferred
suppliers in Louisiana. We had a very good idea about the dollar amount of
spend in the various buckets for the expansion. The capital job estimates had
already been done and approved. We had four bucket areas in MRO: mechanical,
electrical, piping and valves and operating supplies. We already had cost plus
pricing contracts for 80% of our MRO. We did however still have at least two
preferred suppliers in almost every major component MRO area like pumps.
I suggested that we leverage the hard work
that we had already accomplished. We would announce the capital expansion at a
preferred supplier meeting and give an approximate future dollar spend in each
of the four buckets (areas). We obviously had a lot of leverage and many of the
bucket dollar numbers were huge. We had fairly accurate data from recent expansions
and the capital job estimates. We then established these ground rules for the
bidding process:
1. There
would be only one round of bids. We urged the suppliers to give the bid their
best shot. There would be no second bid rounds. We did not have the time to
manage multiple bids.
2. We
announced that we would in many cases narrow down the areas where we had two
preferred suppliers to one, unless we had a good business reason for keeping
two.
3. Although
we had negotiated some significant total cost of ownership savings in the
current contracts, we were open to enhancements from the suppliers and
distributers.
4. We
told the suppliers that we would not accept their standard spare parts packages
like we had in the past. We would challenge their typical spares packages but
would be especially open to creative ways of them controlling and managing the
spares at minimal or no cost to us.
5. OEMs
could work with distributers to propose any additional creative services to
provide us.
Quite frankly we had no idea
how this mega-negotiation process would work. Fortunately, we had done a lot of
supplier consolidation before this process. We had not had the time to even
predict cost savings or eventual outcomes. We just did it. As the bids rolled
back in, it was obvious that our suppliers had done their homework. All told the cost and other savings amounted
to 20% of the 5 billion dollars or 1 billion dollars! We were stunned.
For the next year, I and my supply management colleague, had to endure the
“handle” or nickname of “the
billion-dollar boys”, whenever we entered a meeting.
Yes,
we were good and worked hard, but we were also very lucky. The fact that the
company was spending that much capital at one time when we were transforming to
supply management really helped our leverage and savings potential.
Author’s
Biography
Dr. Tom DePaoli, (Dr. Tom) is currently the CEO of Apollo
Solutions (http://www.apollosolutions.us),
which does general business consulting. He has had successful careers in corporations,
non-profits, the military and academia. He has authored 11 books all available on
Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/author/tomdepaoli
No comments:
Post a Comment